Interferometer arrangement for unambiguous determination of an angle of incidence of incident electromagnetic radiation

ABSTRACT

An interferometer arrangement includes an antenna array that receives radiation from a plane wave emitted by a transmitter, the radiation being incident on the array at an angle (θ). The array includes a plurality of antennas that provide output signals to a switching unit. The switching unit selects pairs of signals and passes them to a processor for processing. The processor is configured to produce an output signal that unambiguously indicates the value of the angle (θ).

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/GB2004/001500, filed on Apr. 6, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to interferometers and is more particularly concerned with the measurement of angle of incidence of electromagnetic radiation incident on such an interferometer.

It is known to use a pair of antennas to detect the location of an electromagnetic signal. The pair of antennas is arranged such that the spacing between the two antennas is such that the phase difference, φ, of the signals arriving at the antennas-can be calculated using Bragg's law:

$\phi = \frac{2\;\pi\; d\mspace{11mu}\sin\mspace{11mu}\theta}{\lambda}$ where θ is the angle at which the signals approach the two antennas, d is the spacing between the antennas and λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation.

The phase difference of the incident electromagnetic signal at the two antennas can be measured and the location of the electromagnetic signal can then be determined from the angle at which the signals approach the two antennas using Bragg's law.

However, the phase difference between the signals arriving at two antennas can only be measured modulo 2π. This means that for a phase difference of φ there may be more than one value that will satisfy Bragg's law thereby producing an ambiguous result. In order to overcome this problem, it is necessary to locate the pair of antennas sufficiently close so that no matter what angle, θ, at which the incident radiation arrives at the antennas, the phase difference would never exceed 2π. In order to do this, the phase difference, φ, must be kept in the interval [−π, π), such that:

$\pi > {{\frac{2\;\pi\; d\mspace{11mu}\sin\mspace{11mu}\theta}{\lambda}}.}$

For incident radiation having a frequency of less than 18 GHz and an antenna specification where θ is limited such that |θ|<60°, then d=d_(o) is 9.2 mm as a suitable separation between the two antennas.

However, while this is possible in theory, it is practically impossible for the antennas to be less than a few centimeters apart. This leads to ambiguity as to how many 2π are needed to add to the measured phase to get the correct measurement.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an interferometer arrangement which overcomes the problems mentioned above and provides unambiguous determinations of the angle of incidence of incident electromagnetic radiation.

SUMMARY

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an interferometer arrangement comprising at least three antennas arranged to receive a plane wave of electromagnetic radiation from a transmitter, each antenna being spaced from one another in at least two orthogonal dimensions of a plane such that the spacing in each dimension between pairs of antennas are integral multiples of the unit spacing determined by the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation and the characteristics of the antennas.

The antennas may be arranged in a plane in a planar antenna array. In this case, the vector spacing k_(i) between pairs of antennas, where i=1, 2, . . . , m, is such that by application of two matrices Q_(x) and Q_(y) with integer entries, it can be resolved into two orthogonal linear arrays which each have spacing vectors k_(x) and k_(y) whose integer entries respectively have the highest common factor of 1.

The unit spacing in each of the two dimensions may be different to provide different angular sensitivity.

Alternatively, the antennas may be arranged in three dimensions in a non-planar antenna array. In this case, the vector spacing k_(i) between pairs of antennas, where i=1, 2, . . . , m, is such that by application of three matrices Q_(x), Q_(y) and Q_(z) with integer entries, it can be resolved into three orthogonal linear arrays which each have spacing vectors k_(x), k_(y) and k_(z) whose integer entries respectively have the highest common factor of 1.

Advantageously, in three-dimensional arrangement, it is possible to measure both direction of arrival and frequency simultaneously.

In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of determining the location of a transmitter of electromagnetic radiation using an interferometer arrangement according to any one of the preceding claims, the method comprising the steps of: receiving radiation from the transmitter; selecting signals from a number of pairs of antennas in the interferometer arrangement for processing; and processing the selected signals from the selected pairs of antennas to determine unambiguously the location of the transmitter. Preferably, the signals are selected from at least three pairs of antennas.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the present invention, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of conventional apparatus for determining the location of a radar or other incident electromagnetic radiation;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of apparatus for determining the location of a transmitter of electromagnetic radiation in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an antenna array for use in the apparatus of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 illustrates the number of pairings from four antennas;

FIG. 5 illustrates the possible combinations for selecting four pairings for four antennas;

FIG. 6 illustrates a simplified embodiment of an antenna array in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7 illustrates Bragg's law for three dimensions where an antenna array is aligned in the x-y plane;

FIG. 8 illustrates a simplified drawing of a second embodiment of an antenna array for use in the apparatus of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 9 illustrates a second simplified embodiment of an antenna array in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a conventional interferometer arrangement 10 is shown in which two antennas 12, 14 are spaced apart a distance, d. Each antenna 12, 14 is arranged to receive a plane wave 16 of electromagnetic radiation being emitted from a transmitter (not shown) located at an unknown angle, θ. Each antenna 12, 14 is selected to receive radiation from the plane wave 16 at a particular frequency and hence wavelength, λ.

Each antenna 12, 14, when it receives radiation from the plane wave 16, produces an output signal 18, 20 which is passed to a processor 22 for processing. Processor 22 determines the unknown angle, θ, of the transmitter using Bragg's law:

$\phi = \frac{2\;\pi\; d\mspace{11mu}\sin\mspace{11mu}\theta}{\lambda}$ as the phase difference, φ, between the radiation arriving at each antenna 12, 14 can also be measured or determined. However, as mentioned above, the phase difference between the signals arriving at each antenna 12, 14 can only be measured to modulo 2π, and ambiguity may exist in the determined value of θ.

If χ is the phase difference which is actually measured between the two antennas, then the errors can be expressed as follows:

χ = α d + ɛ + Δ where: ${\alpha = \frac{2\;\pi\mspace{11mu}\sin\mspace{11mu}\theta}{\lambda}},{\left. ɛ \right.\sim{N\left( {0,\sigma^{2}} \right)}}$ and Δ is the deterministic error and ε is a random variable which is distributed with a normal distribution having a mean of 0 and a variance of σ². For ease of explanation, Δ will be ignored in the following example, but it will be readily appreciated that Δ can be allowed for in any practical system in accordance with known processing techniques.

Deterministic errors refer to the phase measurement errors which have a non-zero mean between RF antenna channels and occurs where two channels of a M-channel RF switch is used with a systematic path difference in the switch. The present invention allows for sequential measurement of the antenna pair phase difference (two channel receiver) or simultaneous measurement of phase at each antenna (N-channel receiver) and the subtraction of the phases to form the phase differences. The choice of measurement scheme is reflected in the measurement covariance matrix R which is diagonal for the first case and non-diagonal for the second case.

Non-deterministic errors refer to the phase measurement errors which have a zero mean between RF antenna channels. These errors would occur where the RF channels behind the antennas are perfectly matched, for example, matched cables and no path differences introduced by RF switches.

In accordance with the present invention, an improved interferometer arrangement 30 is shown in FIG. 2. The interferometer arrangement 30 comprises an antenna array 32 which receives a plane wave 34 of electromagnetic radiation from a transmitter (not shown) located at an unknown angle, θ, as before. The antenna array 32 comprises a plurality of antennas which receive the radiation of the plane wave 34. In this particular example, there are four antennas (not shown individually). Each antenna provides an output signal 36, 38, 40, 42 to a switching unit 44 which selects two of the output signals, say 38, 40, to pass to processor 46 for processing. Here, four pairs of signals from different antenna pairs are selected and passed to the processor for processing. Processor 46 processes the four pairs of signals and provides an output signal 48 which gives the value of θ.

Alternatively, if a digital receiver is used to receive the signals, switching unit 44 is not needed. This is because the signals received by the digital receiver can be combined in any way necessary to provide θ.

FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an antenna array 32 in more detail. The array 32 includes four antennas 50, 52, 54, 56 arranged in a straight line. Each antenna 50, 52, 54, 56 may comprise a spiral antenna as described in EP-A-1 026 777. Alternatively, any other suitable antenna can be used.

Each antenna 50, 52, 54, 56 is spaced from its adjacent antennas such that the spacing between antenna 50 and antenna 54 is L₁, the spacing between antenna 52 and antenna 56 is L₂, the spacing between antenna 54 and antenna 56 is L₃, and the spacing between antenna 50 and antenna 56 is L₄. The choice of pairings is by way of example in this particular embodiment.

As discussed above, for radiation frequencies of less than 18 GHz, the value of the spacing, d₀, between a pair of antennas which allows the phase to be unambiguously identified is 9.2 mm. In accordance with the present invention, L₁, L₂, L₃ and L₄ are chosen to be integral multiples of d₀, that is: L₁=k₁d₀ p1 L₂=k₂d₀ L₃=k₃d₀ L₄=k₄d₀ where k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ are relatively prime. This means that the values of k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ have a highest common factor such that hcf(k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄)=1.

By combining measurements of phase difference between various pairs of antennas in antenna array 32, a good estimate of the phase difference that would be measured between two antennas that had a separation distance d₀ can be obtained. This unambiguously gives the angle of arrival, θ.

However, it is to be noted that when choosing the values of k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ the values must be physically realizable. One way of determining if the values of k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ are physically realistic is by running through all possible values for k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ for each possible way of separating four antennas, and for each way, examining the different values of k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ produced by picking different sets of pairs of antennas.

For example, for the example shown in FIG. 3, four pairs of antennas must be picked from the six possible choices as shown in FIG. 4. This gives 15 different ways of choosing four pairs of antennas as shown in FIG. 5. Of the 15 different choices shown, choices 1 to 6 can be considered as being mirror images of choices 10 to 15 and therefore the choices can be limited to choices 1 to 9.

When an antenna array 32 as described with reference to FIG. 3 is utilized in the interferometer arrangement 30, a plurality of virtual interferometers is formed. In order to describe how this works in more detail, a simpler antenna array having three antennas is illustrated in FIG. 6.

In FIG. 6, a line of three antennas A, B, C is shown. Each pair of antennas A-B, B-C, A-C has an integer multiple of do between them as shown, namely, 3 d₀ between A-B, 2 d₀ between B-C and 5 d₀ between A-C. In this example, three virtual interferometers can be constructed and M=3. In general, if there are several antennas in a line, it is necessary to identify M pairs of antennas and make M phase difference measurements between these pairs. The same antennas may be used in more than one pair, but note that if the measurements are to be independent, it may be necessary to do one measurement a split second after another.

In the example shown in FIG. 6, k=(5, 2, 3)^(T) if the signals are processed from antenna pairs in the order A-C, B-C and A-B.

In order to determine the positions of the antennas in a particular space, it is necessary to determine the maximum size allowed for the antenna array in the x and P directions. The antenna coordinates are integral numbers of the separate unit distances in the x and y directions respectively. The choice of unit distances determines the frequency and unambiguous angle range in horizontal and vertical elevations.

The next step is to determine the number of antennas to be used and the number of antenna pairs which are to be used to measure phase differences. It is not required to have a common reference antenna. A set of possible antenna meta x-coordinate spacings {K′_(x)} is constructed. The term ‘spacing’ means the distance between antenna pairs selected to make a measurement. These are not the physical antenna x-coordinates but just a stage in the determination. The spacings have a highest common factor (HCF) of 1. Similarly, a set of all possible y-coordinate spacings {K_(y)} is constructed for the y-dimension. All values for x and y are excluded if they fall outside the maximum size of the array.

A set of physical spacing matrices {K=[K_(x)K_(y)]} is produced by iterating over all possible physical x- and y-antenna positions. From the set of possible K matrices and the set of possible meta x-coordinate spacings {K′_(x)}, combinations are chosen which have a mapping matrix Q_(x) which satisfies the condition Q_(x)K_(x)=K′_(x) and Q_(x)K_(y)=0. A candidate set is recorded in accordance with the candidate geometries (K,Q_(x)). The candidate set is edited to remove mirror-image candidate geometries.

A set of possible antenna meta y-coordinate spacings {K′_(y)} are constructed. As before, these have HCF=1. From the candidate geometries (K,Q_(x)) and the set of meta y-coordinate spacings {K′_(y)}, combinations are chosen which have a mapping matrix Q_(y) which satisfies the condition Q_(y)K_(y)=K′_(y) and Q_(y)K_(y)=0. The candidate geometries (K,Q_(x),Q_(y)) are recorded in the candidate set.

For each geometry (K,Q_(x),Q_(y)) in the candidate set, two matrices P_(x) and P_(y) are found which satisfy P_(x)K′_(x)=ξ and P_(y)K′_(y)=ξ where ξ is a column vector of all 1s. All entries without a solution are rejected and the candidate geometries (K,Q_(x),Q_(y),P_(x),P_(y)) are recorded in the candidate set.

For each candidate antenna configuration, statistical measurement accuracy is calculated and the best candidate antenna configurations are selected for constructing the base plate of the antenna design.

It is to be noted that the difference between a deterministic and non-deterministic design revolves around the calculation of the matrices (K,Q_(x),Q_(y),P_(x),P_(y)) with the condition that P_(x)Q_(x)ξ=o and P_(y)Q_(y)ξ=o where o is a column vector of zeros. The size of Q_(x), Q_(y), P_(x) and P_(y) is reduced by one column vector to accommodate this.

In order to construct N virtual interferometers, where N≦M, a M×N matrix P is produced such that P^(T)k =ξ where

$\xi = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ \ldots \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$ of length N and k is the matrix of the values of k₁, . . . , k_(m). If the vectors p₁, . . . p_(N) are the columns of P, then for m=1, . . . , N, P^(T) _(m)k=1.

For example, when N=3,

${P = \begin{pmatrix} {- 1} & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & {- 2} & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & {- 1} \end{pmatrix}},{p_{1} = \begin{pmatrix} {- 1} \\ 0 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}},{p_{2} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ {- 2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}},{p_{3} = {\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 2 \\ {- 1} \end{pmatrix}.}}$

Now if

${\chi = {{\begin{pmatrix} \chi_{1} \\ \ldots \\ \chi_{M} \end{pmatrix}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu} ɛ} = \begin{pmatrix} ɛ_{1} \\ \ldots \\ ɛ_{M} \end{pmatrix}}},$ then χ=(αd₀)k+ε where

$\alpha = {\frac{2\;\pi\mspace{11mu}\sin\mspace{11mu}\theta}{\lambda}.}$

If the phase difference, ζ_(m), associated with the m th virtual interferometer is defined as ζ_(m)=p_(m) ^(T)χ and

${\zeta = \begin{pmatrix} \zeta_{1} \\ \ldots \\ \zeta_{N} \end{pmatrix}},$ then ζ=P^(T)χ=βξ+P^(T)ε where β=αd₀.

For example,

$\begin{pmatrix} \zeta_{1} \\ \zeta_{2} \\ \zeta_{3} \end{pmatrix} = {\begin{pmatrix} {{2\;\chi_{3}} - \chi_{1}} \\ {\chi_{1} - {2\;\chi_{2}}} \\ {{2\;\chi_{2}} - \chi_{3}} \end{pmatrix} = {{\beta\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}} + {\begin{pmatrix} {{2\; ɛ_{2}} - ɛ_{1}} \\ {ɛ_{1} - {2\; ɛ_{2}}} \\ {{2\; ɛ_{2}} - ɛ_{3}} \end{pmatrix}.}}}$

Given measurements ζ₁, . . . ζ_(N), it is necessary to estimate β. It is possible to use the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), which is the value of β which maximizes the joint density function given the measurements, that is, given

${\zeta = \begin{pmatrix} \zeta_{1} \\ \ldots \\ \zeta_{N} \end{pmatrix}},$ maximize

$\frac{1}{\left( {\left( {2\;\pi} \right)^{n}{C}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{\exp\left( {{- \frac{1}{2}}\delta^{T}C^{- 1}\delta} \right)}$ with respect to β where C=P^(T)RP and δ˜N(0, C). This is achieved by minimizing H=δ^(T)C⁻¹δ.

If the estimate is {circumflex over (β)}, then since C is symmetric:

$\begin{matrix} {{0 = \frac{\partial H}{\partial\beta}}}_{\beta = \hat{\beta}} \\ {{= {\frac{\partial}{\partial\beta}\left( {\left( {\zeta - {\beta\;\xi}} \right)^{T}{C^{- 1}\left( {\zeta - {\beta\;\xi}} \right)}} \right)}}}_{\beta = \hat{\beta}} \\ {= {{\xi^{T}{C^{- 1}\left( {\zeta - {\hat{\beta}\;\xi}} \right)}} - {\left( {\zeta - {\beta\;\xi}} \right)^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}}} \\ {= {{- 2}\;\xi^{T}{C^{- 1}\left( {\zeta - {\hat{\beta}\;\xi}} \right)}}} \end{matrix}$

Hence

${\hat{\beta} = {{\frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\zeta}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{E(\zeta)}} = {{E\left( {{\beta\;\xi} + {P^{T}ɛ}} \right)} = {\beta\;\xi}}}},$ thus it follows that E({circumflex over (β)})=β and the estimator is unbiased. The estimator variance is:

$\begin{matrix} {{E\left( {\beta - \hat{\beta}} \right)}^{2} = {E\left( {\beta - \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\zeta}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}} \right)}^{2}} \\ {= {E\left( {\beta - \frac{\xi^{T}{C^{- 1}\left( {{\beta\;\xi} + \delta} \right)}}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}} \right)}^{2}} \\ {= {E\left( \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\delta}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} \right)}^{2}} \\ {= {E\left( \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\delta\;{\delta^{T}\left( C^{- 1} \right)}^{T}\xi}{\left( {\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} \right)^{2}} \right)}} \\ {= \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}{E\left( {\delta\;\delta^{T}} \right)}\left( C^{- 1} \right)^{T}\xi}{\left( {\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} \right)^{2}}} \\ {= \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}{C\left( C^{- 1} \right)}^{T}\xi}{\left( {\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} \right)^{2}}} \\ {= \frac{1}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}} \end{matrix}$ since E(δδ^(T))=C by definition and C is symmetric.

In the examples above, if errors ε₁, ε₂ and ε₃ are independent, then R=σ²I and

$\begin{matrix} {C = {P^{T}{RP}}} \\ {= {\sigma^{2}P^{T}P}} \\ {= {{\sigma^{2}\begin{pmatrix} {- 1} & 0 & 2 \\ 1 & {- 2} & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & {- 1} \end{pmatrix}}\begin{pmatrix} {- 1} & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & {- 2} & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & {- 1} \end{pmatrix}}} \\ {= {\sigma^{2}\begin{pmatrix} 5 & {- 1} & {- 2} \\ {- 1} & 5 & {- 4} \\ {- 2} & {- 4} & 5 \end{pmatrix}}} \end{matrix}$ $C^{- 1} = {\frac{1}{4\;\sigma^{2}}\begin{pmatrix} 9 & 13 & 14 \\ 13 & 21 & 22 \\ 14 & 22 & 24 \end{pmatrix}}$ ${\xi^{T}C^{- 1}} = {\frac{1}{\sigma^{2}}\begin{pmatrix} 9 & 14 & 15 \end{pmatrix}}$ ${\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} = {38\frac{1}{\sigma^{2}}}$

Therefore,

$\hat{\beta} = \frac{{9\;\zeta_{1}} + {14\;\zeta_{2}} + {15\;\zeta_{3}}}{38}$ and the variance

${E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2} = {\frac{1}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi} = {\frac{\sigma^{2}}{38}.}}$

It is to be noted that values χ₁, . . . , χ_(M) and ζ₁, . . . ζ_(N) are only known modulo 2π, but since ζ_(j) represents a phase difference of a virtual interferometer of unit distance, d₀, then the value ζ_(j) which is taken to lie in the interval [−π, π), is the correct phase.

If the correct number of 2π's are known to add onto {tilde over (χ)}_(j) to make χ_(j), then it would not be necessary to construct the ζ_(j)'s. The sole purpose of the ζ_(j)'s is to get over the problem of the ‘lost’ 2π's. If the correct number of 2π's is known to add to {tilde over (χ)}_(j) to make χ_(j), then ζ=P^(T)χ and ξ=P^(T)k.

Hence,

$\begin{matrix} {\hat{\beta} = \frac{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\zeta}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}} \\ {= \frac{k^{T}{P\left( {P^{T}{RP}} \right)}^{- 1}P^{T}\chi}{k^{T}{P\left( {P^{T}{RP}} \right)}^{- 1}P^{T}k}} \end{matrix}$ and the variance is

$\begin{matrix} {{E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2} = \frac{1}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}} \\ {= \frac{1}{k^{T}{P\left( {P^{T}{RP}} \right)}^{- 1}P^{T}k}} \end{matrix}$

In the case where M=N and P is a square matrix, then

$\hat{\beta} = {{\frac{k^{T}R^{- 1}\chi}{k^{T}R^{- 1}k}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2}} = {\frac{1}{k^{T}R^{- 1}k}.}}$

Furthermore, if the measurements are independent so that R=σ²I, then

$\hat{\beta} = {{\frac{k^{T}\chi}{{k}^{2}}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2}} = {\frac{\sigma^{2}}{{k}^{2}}.}}$

For example,

$\hat{\beta} = {{\frac{{5\chi_{1}} + {2\chi_{2}} + {3\chi_{3}}}{38}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2}} = {\frac{\sigma^{2}}{38}.}}$

If nullifying deterministic error has to be considered, then P will be forced not to be a square matrix.

{tilde over (β)} is always an unbiased estimator, no matter how k and P are chosen. So the problem is to find k and P that minimizes

${E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2} = {\frac{1}{k^{T}{P\left( {P^{T}{RP}} \right)}^{- 1}P^{T}k} = {\frac{1}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}.}}$

It may seem, by the expression on the right hand side, that E({tilde over (β)}−β)² does not depend on k, since ξ=(1, 1, . . . , 1)^(T) and C=P^(T)RP, but different choices of k allow different choices of P, so E({tilde over (β)}−β)² must be minimized over all possible k and P.

k is chosen such that hcf(k₁, . . . k_(m))=C where C is the largest positive integer to divide k_(i) for every i=1, . . . , M. In forming a column of P, a vector p=(p₁, . . . , p_(m))^(T) must be found such that k^(T)p=1, that is, for M linearly independent vectors p₁, . . . , p_(m), p₁ ^(T)k=p₂ ^(T)k= . . . =P_(m) ^(T)k=1. However, it can be shown that this is only valid if and only if hcf(k₁, . . . , k_(m))=1.

As the possible choices of k and P are searched to minimize the variance, E({tilde over (β)}−β)², it is only necessary to search through k=(k₁, . . . , k_(M))^(T) with hcf(k₁, . . . k_(M))=1.

In the case where Δ, the deterministic error is zero, it is possible to find M linearly independent vectors p₁, . . . , p_(M) such that p_(m) ^(T)k=1 for all M. This means that P can be made into a square M×M matrix.

Hence

${E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2} = {\frac{1}{k^{T}R^{- 1}k}.}$

If Δ≠0, it is always possible find M−1 linearly independent vectors and never any more, such that p_(m) ^(T)k=1 and p_(m) ^(T)ξ′=0 for all m. The extra condition p_(m) ^(T)ξ′=0 has reduced the number of linearly independent vectors that can be found by one. Now P is a M×(M−1) matrix and

${{E\left( {\hat{\beta} - \beta} \right)}^{2} = \frac{1}{\xi^{T}C^{- 1}\xi}},{{{where}\mspace{14mu} C} = {P^{T}{{RP}.}}}$

If the antennas are to be fixed into a relatively small space, for example taking up no more than about 50 to 100 cm, the search can be limited to those k's with entries less than 100.

While the antenna array 32 of FIG. 3 has been described as being one-dimensional, that is, a plurality of antennas spaced at different distances along the same straight line, the antenna array 32 may also comprise a plurality of antennas spaced at different-distances in the same plane.

Before describing a specific embodiment of such a two-dimensional or planar arrangement, Bragg's law in two dimensions will be discussed with reference to FIG. 7.

In FIG. 7, a plane wave is shown incident on a pair of antennas lying in the x-y plane which are spaced apart by a distance vector d=d_(x)i+d_(y)j. The x- and y-component distances are integrals of the same unit spacing d₀. The plane wave arrives in a direction described by the unit vector {circumflex over (v)}=(v_(x), v_(y), v_(z))^(T) in three dimensions. The phase difference, in two dimensions, experienced between the two antennas is:

${{\frac{2\;\pi}{\lambda}d^{T}\hat{v}} = {{\frac{2\;\pi}{\lambda}d_{x}v_{x}} + {\frac{2\;\pi}{\lambda}d_{y}v_{y}}}},{{{and}\mspace{14mu}\phi_{x}} = \frac{2\;\pi\; d_{0}v_{x}}{\lambda}}$ is the theoretical phase difference that would be measured between two antennas separated by the distance vector d₀i and

$\phi_{y} = \frac{2\;\pi\; d_{0}v_{y}}{\lambda}$ is the theoretical phase difference corresponding to the distance vector d₀j.

If two antennas are separated by distance vector d, then, χ, the phase difference measured between the two antennas, satisfies

$\chi = {\frac{2\;\pi\; d^{T}v}{\lambda} + {ɛ\mspace{14mu}{where}\mspace{14mu}{{\left. ɛ \right.\sim{N\left( {0,\sigma^{2}} \right)}}.}}}$

FIG. 8 illustrates a two-dimensional arrangement in which four antennas A, B, C, D are placed in a plane rather than a straight line with separations in the i and j directions which are integer multiples of d₀ as shown. In the illustrated example, antenna pair A-B are separated by m₁d₀ in one direction and by m₂d₀ in the other direction. Similarly, antenna pair B-C are separated by m3d₀ and m₄d₀ and antenna pair C-D by m₅d₀ and m₆d₀.

In order to describe how such a two-dimensional antenna array works, a simplified example is shown in FIG. 9. Again, four antennas A, B, C, D are shown in a plane with A and C being aligned in one direction and B and D being in another direction compared to the alignment direction of A and C. Here, the integral separation is the same in the x and y directions. It may be difficult to obtain different angle and frequency ranges in the x and y directions. If the separation in the x and y direction respectively is k_(j1), k_(j2) between the antennas of the jth pair, then the matrix, K, defining these separations can be expressed as:

$K = \begin{pmatrix} k_{11} & k_{12} \\ k_{21} & k_{22} \\ k_{31} & k_{32} \\ k_{41} & k_{42} \end{pmatrix}$

Using the antenna pairs of A-B, C-D, A-D and B-C, K can be populated for the example in FIG. 9 as follows:

$K = {\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 4 & 1 \\ 9 & 1 \\ 3 & {- 1} \end{pmatrix}.}$

If χ₁, χ₂, χ₃, χ₄ are the measured phase differences between these antenna pairs, then the matrix of these phase differences can be expressed as χ=(χ₁, χ₂, χ₃, χ₄)^(T) and the matrix of the phase measurement error as ε=(ε₁, ε₂, ε₃, ε₄)^(T). It then follows that:

$\chi = {{K\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{x} \\ \phi_{y} \end{pmatrix}} + ɛ}$ which becomes:.

$\begin{pmatrix} \chi_{1} \\ \chi_{2} \\ \chi_{3} \\ \chi_{4} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} {{2\;\phi_{x}} + \phi_{y} + ɛ_{1}} \\ {{4\;\phi_{x}} + \phi_{y} + ɛ_{2}} \\ {{9\;\phi_{x}} + \phi_{y} + ɛ_{3}} \\ {{3\;\phi_{x}} - \phi_{y} + ɛ_{4}} \end{pmatrix}$ for the particular example in FIG. 9.

To determine φ_(x) and φ_(y), two N×4 matrices, Q_(x) and Q_(y) need to be determined so that the rows of Q_(x) and Q_(y) are linearly independent such that: [Q_(x)K]_(i2)=0 for all i=1, . . . , N [Q_(y)K]_(i1)=0 for all i=1, . . . , N

The reason for the requirement of linearly independent rows is so that no singular covariance matrices are formed. In this case,

${Q_{x} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}},{Q_{y} = {\begin{pmatrix} 2 & {- 1} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & {- 3} \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & {- 4} \end{pmatrix}.{Hence}}},{{Q_{x}K} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & 0 \\ 7 & 0 \\ 12 & 0 \end{pmatrix}},{{Q_{y}K} = {\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 \\ 0 & 7 \end{pmatrix}.}}$

In order to use the same method as for a linear array, the hcf of the x and y column entries (i.e. non-zero) must be 1.

Applying Q_(x) and Q_(y) to the phase differences, χ, which have been measured gives:

${Q_{x}\chi} = {{Q_{x}{K\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{x} \\ \phi_{y} \end{pmatrix}}} + {Q_{x}ɛ}}$ ${Q_{y}\chi} = {{Q_{y}{K\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{y} \\ \phi_{y} \end{pmatrix}}} + {Q_{y}{ɛ.}}}$

For example,

$\begin{pmatrix} {\chi_{1} + \chi_{4}} \\ {\chi_{2} + \chi_{4}} \\ {\chi_{3} + \chi_{4}} \end{pmatrix} = {{\begin{pmatrix} {{5\;\phi_{x}} + ɛ_{1} + ɛ_{4}} \\ {{7\;\phi_{x}} + ɛ_{2} + ɛ_{4}} \\ {{12\phi_{x}} + ɛ_{3} + ɛ_{4}} \end{pmatrix}\mspace{14mu}{{and}\text{}\begin{pmatrix} {{2\chi_{1}} - \chi_{2}} \\ {\chi_{3} - {3\chi_{4}}} \\ {{3\chi_{2}} - {4\chi_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}}} = {\begin{pmatrix} {\;{\phi_{y} + {2ɛ_{1}} - ɛ_{2}}} \\ {{4\;\phi_{y}} + ɛ_{3} - {3ɛ_{4}}} \\ {{7\phi_{y}} + {3ɛ_{2}} - {4ɛ_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}.}}$

Then it is necessary to find P_(x), P_(y) which are N×N invertible matrices with integer entries such that

${P_{x}Q_{x}K_{x}} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ \ldots \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$ of length N and

${P_{y}Q_{y}K_{y}} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ \ldots \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$ of length N, where K_(x) and K_(y) are the columns of K, i.e. K=(K_(x) K_(y)).

If ζ_(x)=P_(x)Q_(x)χ, ζ_(y)=P_(y)Q_(y)χ, A_(x)=P_(x)Q_(x) and A_(y)=P_(y)Q_(y), then

${{P_{x}Q_{x}\chi} = {{P_{x}Q_{x}{K\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{x} \\ \phi_{y} \end{pmatrix}}} + {P_{x}Q_{x}ɛ}}},\text{i.e.},{\zeta_{x} = {{{\phi_{x}\xi} + {A_{x}ɛ\mspace{14mu}{where}\mspace{14mu}\xi}} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ \ldots \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}}}$ of length N and ζ_(y)=φ_(y)ξ+A_(y)ε.

For example,

$P_{x} = {{\begin{pmatrix} 3 & {- 2} & 0 \\ 5 & 0 & {- 2} \\ {- 6} & 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}\mspace{14mu} P_{y}} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 & {- 1} \\ 5 & {- 1} & 0 \\ {- 6} & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}}$ $A_{x} = {{P_{x}Q_{x}} = \begin{pmatrix} 3 & {- 2} & 0 & 1 \\ 5 & 0 & {- 2} & 3 \\ {- 6} & 1 & 2 & {- 3} \end{pmatrix}}$ $A_{y} = {P_{y}{Q_{y}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & {- 3} & 2 & {- 2} \\ 10 & {- 5} & {- 1} & 3 \\ {- 12} & {- 3} & 0 & {- 4} \end{pmatrix}}}$ $\begin{matrix} {\begin{pmatrix} \zeta_{x_{1}} \\ \zeta_{x_{2}} \\ \zeta_{x_{3}} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} {{3\chi_{1}} - {2\chi_{2}} + \chi_{4}} \\ {{5\chi_{1}} - {2\chi_{3}} + {3\chi_{4}}} \\ {{{- 6}\chi_{1}} + \chi_{2} + {2\chi_{3}} - {3\chi_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}} \\ {= \begin{pmatrix} {\phi_{x} + {3ɛ_{1}} - {2\; ɛ_{2}} + ɛ_{4}} \\ {\phi_{x} + {5ɛ_{1}} - {2ɛ_{3}} + {3ɛ_{4}}} \\ {\phi_{x} - {6ɛ_{1}} + ɛ_{2} + {2ɛ_{3}} - {3ɛ_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}} \end{matrix}$ $\begin{matrix} {\begin{pmatrix} \zeta_{y_{1}} \\ \zeta_{y_{2}} \\ \zeta_{y_{3}} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} {{{- 3}\chi_{2}} + {2\chi_{3}} - {2\chi_{4}}} \\ {{10\chi_{1}} - {5\chi_{2}} - \chi_{3} + {3\chi_{4}}} \\ {{{- 12}\chi_{1}} - {3\chi_{2}} - {4\chi_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}} \\ {= {\begin{pmatrix} {\phi_{y} - {3ɛ_{2}} + {2\; ɛ_{3}} - {2ɛ_{4}}} \\ {\phi_{y} + {10ɛ_{1}} - {5ɛ_{2}} - ɛ_{3} + {3ɛ_{4}}} \\ {\phi_{y} - {12ɛ_{1}} - {3ɛ_{2}} - {4ɛ_{4}}} \end{pmatrix}.}} \end{matrix}$

Like the one-dimensional case, it is possible to start out with measurements {tilde over (χ)}_(j) which are a multiple of 2π out from their true value χ_(j). However, in creating linear multiples ζ_(x) ₁ , ζ_(x) ₂ , ζ_(x) ₃ , which are estimating the value φ_(x), which lies in the range [−π, π), it is possible to overcome this problem by recording {tilde over (ζ)}_(x) ₁ , {tilde over (ζ)}_(x) ₂ , {tilde over (ζ)}_(x) ₃ , modulo 2π.

Now it is possible to use the techniques of the one-dimensional case to provide estimates {circumflex over (φ)}_(x), {circumflex over (φ)}_(y) for φ_(x) and φ_(y).

Compare the 1-D equations ζ=βξ+P^(T)ε to the 2-D equations: ζ_(x)=φ_(x)ξ+A_(x)ε ζ_(y)=φ_(y)ξ+A_(y)ε

Hence, the estimators for the 2-D case are:

${{\hat{\phi}}_{x} = \frac{\xi^{T}C_{x}^{- 1}\zeta_{x}}{\xi^{T}C_{x}^{- 1}\xi}},\mspace{31mu}{{\hat{\phi}}_{y} = \frac{\xi^{T}C_{y}^{- 1}\zeta_{y}}{\xi^{T}C_{y}^{- 1}\xi}},$ where C_(x)=A_(x)RA^(T) _(x), C_(y)=A_(y)RA^(T) _(y) and R is the covariance matrix of the ε_(i)'s.

These estimators have variances

$\frac{1}{\xi^{T}C_{x}^{- 1}\xi}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}\frac{1}{\xi^{T}C_{y}^{- 1}\xi}$ respectively.

In estimating φ_(x) and φ_(y), estimates are also obtained for v_(x) and v_(y), since

${\phi_{x} = \frac{2\pi\; d_{0}v_{x}}{\lambda}},{{{and}\mspace{14mu}\phi_{y}} = {\frac{2\pi\; d_{0}v_{y}}{\lambda}.}}$ So the above estimates provide an estimate for {circumflex over (v)}=(v_(x), v_(y), √{square root over (1−v_(x) ²−v_(y) ²)})^(T). If the method is repeated several times to get different estimates for {circumflex over (v)}, the technique builds up a most likely position for a transmitter of the plane wave of electromagnetic radiation. The technique involves minimizing the squares of the errors in estimating v_(x) and v_(y).

It is to be noted that the errors for φ_(X) and φ_(y) are not independent and that they have a degree of covariance. This covariance can be calculated and allowed for but this is not described in detail here.

While the present invention has been described with reference to one-dimensional and two-dimensional antenna arrays, it Will be appreciated that the invention can also be extended to three-dimensional arrays. The antennas can be arranged in a non-planar array provided the boresight of each antenna is parallel. Here, in order to determine φ_(x), φ_(y) and φ_(x), three matrices Q_(x), Q_(y) and Q_(x) need to be determined so that the three-dimensional array can be resolved into three orthogonal linear arrays having spacing vectors k_(x), k_(y) and k_(z). The respective integer values of the vectors k_(x), k_(y) and k_(z) have the highest common factor of 1.

In the three-dimensional case, it is possible to measure both angle of arrival and frequency of the incident radiation simultaneously.

It will also be appreciated that, while the invention has been described with reference to antenna arrays having three and four antennas, the invention is not limited to such numbers and any suitable number of antennas may be used in the antenna array provided the spacing requirements discussed above are met. 

1. An interferometer arrangement comprising at least three antennas arranged to receive a plane wave of electromagnetic radiation from a transmitter, each antenna being spaced from one another in at least two orthogonal dimensions of a plane in a physical domain such that the vector spacing k_(i) between pairs of antennas, where i =1, 2, . . . , m, is such that by application of two matrices Q_(x) and Q_(y) with integer entries, it can be resolved into two orthogonal linear arrays which each have spacing vectors k_(x) and k_(y) whose integer entries respectively have the highest common factor of
 1. 2. An interferometer arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the unit spacing in each of the two dimensions may be different to provide different angular sensitivity.
 3. An interferometer arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the antennas are arranged in three dimensions in a non-planar antenna array, and the vector spacing k_(i) between pairs of antennas, where i =1, 2, . . . , m, is such that by application of three matrices Q_(x), Q_(y) and Q_(z) with integer entries, it can be resolved into three orthogonal linear arrays which each have spacing vectors k_(x), k_(y) and k_(z) whose integer entries respectively have the highest common factor of
 1. 4. An interferometer arrangement according to claim 3, wherein it is possible to measure both direction of arrival and frequency simultaneously.
 5. A method of determining the direction of a transmitter of electromagnetic radiation using an interferometer arrangement according to claim 1, the method comprising the steps of: a) receiving radiation from the transmitter; b) selecting signals from a number of pairs of antennas in the interferometer arrangement for processing; and c) processing the selected signals from the selected pairs of antennas to determine unambiguously the direction of the transmitter.
 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein step b) comprises selecting at least three pairs of antennas.
 7. A method of determining the physical location of a plurality of antennas to form an interferometer arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the interferometer arrangement comprises an antenna array, the method comprising the steps of: a) defining a maximum size for the antenna array comprising the plurality of antennas; b) determining the number of antenna pairs to be used for measuring the plane wave of electromagnetic radiation incident on the interferometer arrangement; c) determining coordinates of the antennas in a processing domain such that spacings between pairs of antennas in the processing plane have a highest common factor of 1; d) deriving a set of candidate antenna pair geometries in the physical domain; and e) analysing the candidate set to identify the physical location of the plurality of antennas in the antenna array.
 8. A method according ot claim 7, wherein step c) comprises producing a set of physical spacing matrices K where K =└K_(x) K_(y┘) and K_(x) and K_(y) are the respective matrices of x- and y -coordinates in the physical domain.
 9. A method according to claim 8, wherein step c) comprises determining matrices of K_(x)′ and K_(y)′ of meta x-coordinates and meta y-coordinate spacings respectively.
 10. A method according to claim 9, wherein step d) comprises applying respective mapping matrices Q_(x) and Q_(y) to the physical spacing matrices K_(x) and K_(y) such that Q_(x)K_(x)=K_(x)′ and Q_(x)K_(y)=0 for the meta x -coordinate spacings, and Q_(y)K_(y)=K_(y)′ and Q_(y)K_(x)=0 for the meta y -coordinate spacings.
 11. A method according to claim 10, further including the steps of: (i) deriving a candidate set (K,Q_(x),Q_(y)) of candidate geometries; (ii) finding matrices P_(x) and P_(y) such that P_(x)K_(x)′=ξ and P_(y)K_(y)′=ξ where ξ is a column vector of all ones; (iii) rejecting entries in the candidate set with no solution; and (iv) modifying the candidate set to include P_(x) and P_(y). 